The initial results were provided for common machines of the era, including the Apple II, Commodore 64 and the recently-released IBM Personal Computer. Yet, the results provide some interesting comparative data. the benchmark program presented here is not representative of the way computers are actually used it measures only a few aspects of performance, and no one should buy a computer based solely on the results of these measures. Ahl was careful to state that it tested only a few aspects of the BASIC language, mostly its looping performance. The benchmark first appeared in the November 1983 issue of Creative Computing under the title "Benchmark Comparison Test". History Original result set from November 1983 issue of Creative Computing. Its primary competition in the early 1980s in the United States was the Byte Sieve, of September 1981, while the earlier Rugg/Feldman benchmarks of June 1977 were not as well known in the United States, but were widely used in the United Kingdom. The Creative Computing Benchmark was one of three common benchmarks of the era. Over a period of a few months, the list was greatly expanded to include practically every contemporary machine, topped by the Cray-1 supercomputer, which ran it in 0.01 seconds. It was first introduced in the November 1983 issue of Creative Computing magazine with the measures from a number of 8-bit computers that were popular at the time.
If you get a CPU that performs really well when overclocking, for example, it's common to call that "winning the silicon lottery." This is because it unlocked potential another CPU with the same model number might not have.The Creative Computing Benchmark, also called Ahl's Simple Benchmark, is a computer benchmark that was used to compare the performance of the BASIC programming language on various machines. However, the improvement varies based on a number of factors, right down to the individual build quality of the component you want to overclock. Once you start overclocking a CPU or GPU, you can squeeze out more performance.
Also, pay attention to large file transfer tests-especially if you move a lot of photos or videos between external storage and your PC.įinally, keep in mind that benchmarks in reviews tend to use stock settings, not overclocking.
Look at the speeds for read-write performance, and then compare those to other drives measured in the same review. When it comes to CPUs, compare them based on what you intend to do with your PC. If the CPU you want to use for work doesn’t perform that well in productivity applications, its gaming chops won’t matter. Another popular tool to see how a CPU handles video rendering is CineBench. For example, it tests how your system handles working with spreadsheets, as well as tasks like photo editing, video calls, physics calculations for gaming, and web browsing.
Easy benchmark computer series#
There are standard benchmark suites to test CPUs, such as PCMark 10, which runs your computer through a series of tests. Some might be better at running productivity software, while others excel at 3D rendering, and so on.
Easy benchmark computer Pc#
Since there are so many operations a PC can carry out, you’ll find that different CPUs perform better at one task than others. The latter is called a synthetic benchmark, and there are many options, such as Unigine Heaven, 3DMark, and PassMark.įor CPUs, benchmarks are about workload and how quickly it can carry out instructions. For graphics cards, this usually means a graphics-heavy scene from a video game, or one that could be in a video game. A benchmark is a test or series of tests designed to push the performance of your system or component to see what it's capable of.
0 kommentar(er)
